66°F
sponsored by:
FIND IT WITH OUR NEW DIRECTORY!
Click to activate search window!
Top    Subscribe to our feeds    Add to My Yahoo!
Advertisement

Advertising Info

Article Options

Comments (6 comment(s))  |  Email this story
Print this story  |  Discuss  |  Big Text  |  Normal Text
Current Rating:
0
   Number of Votes:
0
Rate:  |  |  | 
Save and Share  add to yahoo add delicious add to digg add to facebook add to reddit add to newsvine  
   How do I share?
Rep. Bradley: Ameren's plan like 'payday loan business'
BY BECKY MALKOVICH, THE SOUTHERN
Friday, December 22, 2006 7:31 AM CST
The Illinois Commerce Commission's approval of Ameren's plan to offer a phase-in of an electric rate hike could mean consumers will pay more now and pay more later, according to state Rep. John Bradley.

Ameren customers will have the option of phasing in the higher rates over a three-year period. Under the plan, Ameren customers could phase in rate increases ranging from 42 percent to 55 percent by paying a 14 percent increase in each of the first three years of the plan, followed by a 3.25 percent interest payment.

"There are some fees and surcharges in there that will actually cost ratepayers even more than anticipated," The Marion Democrat said. "And the deferred interest? It's almost like Ameren is going into the payday loan business. People will pay for the phase-in and then pay interest for phasing it in."

State Rep. Mike Bost, D-Murphysboro, said the phase-in option means customers of Ameren will pay more in the long run than if they accepted the total increase from the start.

"But the commerce commission had to work with the guidelines they had," Bost said. "If the Democratic leadership - the governor, the speaker of the House and the president of the Senate - would have worked with the Republicans, which we wanted to do, maybe we could have put a temporary freeze into place that would have allowed us to sit down with the ICC to give our input. Then they would have worked within our guidelines, but they (the Democrats) didn't and now this is what we've got."

Bost said he is doubtful the Legislature can do anything to change the imminent rate hike, which goes into effect Jan. 2.

"We won't be back until the second week of January, after the rates and charges are in effect. When the ICC said to go ahead with the increase, essentially that was the state saying to go ahead. Can the state come back now and stop it? Wouldn't that give Ameren the opportunity to hold us liable? I don't know, but it will be interesting," Bost said.

Sen. Dave Luechtefeld said he wanted a compromise on the rate hike, "but it sure wasn't this one. This has been the biggest topic coming into my office for a long time now. People are scared to death of the increase."

The Okawville Republican said he was unsure whether the Legislature will take up the issue when it meets again in the new year.

"I know there will be lots of politicians talking, but in the end, I'm afraid this will stand," he said.

The increase will be the first since a decade-long rate freeze was instituted by the state Legislature. Ameren officials said the price hikes reflect the true cost of electricity.

Without the rate increases, Ameren said it would be forced to cut jobs and possibly seek bankruptcy. Reliability of service also would be in doubt, officials said.

- Kurt Erickson contributed to this story.

 

beckymalk@gmail.com

(618) 927-5633

 


Add Your Own Comments

No account? Register here!

If you already have, sign in below:
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

 

understanding wrote on Dec 27, 2006 9:13 AM:

" what did legislature members think would happen when they froze rates 10 years ago. at one time our local REA's had the lowest rated power in our area but they have been allowed to gradually increase rates and not had to worry about the freeze. take a look at REA rates the same day CIPS rates were frozen and see how much of an increase they've had in the past ten years. I hate the idea of an increase but I blame the ignorance of our government so called "experts" for the problem. It takes a person with a good understanding of the power industry to understand how rates work and I can't imagine Bradley nor Phelps figuring anything that complicated out. they are only able to stir the pot for their own political gain. "

Anonymous wrote on Dec 26, 2006 12:34 PM:

" Sorry if I don't jump on the Ameren pity-party wagon. They throw money at politicians, inaugural parties and other wasteful things. As far as having to let go of employees, Ameren already cut the Grand Tower power plant back to part time several years ago. Why not cut the fat cats who sit on their butts all day raking in the big money instead of threatening the jobs of those who actually get out there and work in the snow/rain/heat. "

Consumer wrote on Dec 22, 2006 9:33 PM:

" To Disgusted - Massive rate hike??? The rate hike will cost the average Ameren customer approximately $1 per day (that = $30 per month). After 10 years of frozen rates (at 1997 prices), $1 per day is NOT a "massive" rate hike. You certainly can't expect Ameren to sell and distribute electricity for less than they have to pay for it in 2007. Do you expect the grocery stores to sell you food for 1997 prices without going bankrupt? Can you name one other thing that you buy (except electricity) for 1997 prices? Is your income frozen at 1997 wages? Would you rather see Ameren be forced to cut their workforce by 25% (unemployment at taxpayers' expense) and have to wait even longer periods of time for power restoration when there aren't enough workers to get power back on quickly? Are you willing to pay higher state taxes when the state has to bail out Ameren after they file bankruptcy? And the biggest question of all - Are you really that "uninformed" that you don't realize that a continued rate freeze and its consequences will actually cost Illinois citizens MORE in the end than the rate hikes??? "

Dennis Waldron wrote on Dec 22, 2006 11:20 AM:

" How could our elected officials allow ameren..to get away with this rate hike..we all need to rethink who we vote for next time "

FED UP wrote on Dec 22, 2006 9:46 AM:

" I have worked in the power industry for 20 years and I am also an Ameren customer. I do not work for Ameren. I am not happy about the huge rate increase either but Ameren has to have the rate increase to stay in business. The real blame here belongs to our own state legislatures. Ten years ago they deregulated the utilities without having a clue what they were doing. No rate hikes for 10 years? What did they think would happen. Now we have uninformed legislatures like Sen. John Bradley who run around pointing their finger at Ameren when they should admit that they caused this mess. And when they had the chance to get a temporary freeze on the rate hikes so they could come up with a plan they elected to play party line politics which come Jan. 2nd will cost us all. Just like last year when the Democrats one and all voted with the Governor to steal from the state workers pension funds. What ever happened to legislatures doing whats best for the residents of Illinois instead of their own private agendas. Shame on you all. "

Disgusted wrote on Dec 22, 2006 9:38 AM:

" This is a very sad situation. Another example of our ineffective leaders who are elected to serve the people. All I hear is the blame game. I say dump Ameren and when you vote the next time vote against those who allowed this massive utility rate hike. "


September 2008
S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30