81°F
sponsored by:
FIND IT WITH OUR NEW DIRECTORY!
Click to activate search window!
Local    Subscribe to our feeds    Add to My Yahoo!
Advertisement

Advertising Info

Article Options

Comments (5 comment(s))  |  Email this story
Print this story  |  Discuss  |  Big Text  |  Normal Text
Current Rating:
0
   Number of Votes:
0
Rate:  |  |  | 
Save and Share  add to yahoo add delicious add to digg add to facebook add to reddit add to newsvine  
   How do I share?
Christian Legal Society, SIUC end two-year battle
by ashley wiehle, the southern
Thursday, May 24, 2007 7:24 AM CDT
CARBONDALE - A two-year battle between a Christian student group and Southern Illinois University Carbondale has resulted in the group being reinstated and a $10,000 scholarship fund.

The Christian Legal Society in April 2005 filed a lawsuit against the university after SIUC revoked the local chapter's registration on the grounds that the group's statement of faith and sexual morality standards followed by voting members and leaders violated a university affirmative action policy.

However, a recent settlement between the university and the group allows the Christian Legal Society to operate as a valid student organization.

The university in the settlement agreed to provide a $10,000 scholarship for Lesar Law School. The scholarship will be awarded to students selected by the Christian Legal Society and the university.

Casey Mattox, litigation counsel for the Center for Law and Religious Freedom for the Christian Legal Society, said the university had previously banned the group from operating on campus.

"They were de-recognized," Mattox said. "Their adviser was taken away. They were told to take everything out of storage at the law school and to change the name. They were told they couldn't use bulletin boards. It was as close as you could get to physically lifting them and taking them off campus as you can get."

The settlement comes after the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit determined in July 2006 that the university had to recognize the local chapter of the Christian Legal Society while the case was still pending in court.

Christian Legal Society leaders and members are opposed to sexual behavior outside of a traditional marriage between a man and a woman, including premarital sex, adultery and homosexuality.

According to the group's "Membership Statement of Faith and Sexual Morality Standards," believing or participating in "acts of the sinful nature" makes one ineligible to be a voting member or leader within the organization.

The mission also states that a voting member is "bound to engage members who are involved in sexual immorality in a dialogue leading to repentance."

Rod Sievers, spokesman for SIUC, said the settlement is important to the university's mission.

"The university does believe the settlement balances the rights of persons with the goals of the state and university," Sievers said.

Sievers said religious groups campuswide can restrict their voting membership but not their overall membership.

"Student religious organizations can limit their leadership and voting membership to people who share their beliefs," Sievers said.

ashley.wiehle@thesouthern.com

529-5454 ext. 5816


Add Your Own Comments

No account? Register here!

If you already have, sign in below:
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

 

Dee wrote on May 25, 2007 12:18 PM:

" To Gary: Hostility? If you can assure me that the Christian Legal Society will recommend the best candidate, be the student Christian or Jew or hindu or Muslim or Atheist, I will be satisfied. If not, I will continue to be hostile to SIU (NOT to the Society) for breaking the law by favoring one religion while taking state funds. What part of this don't you understand? , man or woman, of whatever race "

Gary wrote on May 25, 2007 5:35 AM:

" It is sad to see the hostility toward this Christian membership organization, with the chief problem of it being Christian. Scholarships have been provided based on the characteristics of race and gender with little more than a nod of approval from the university community. Harvard may once again be taking the lead in acknownledging the important of religion in the lives of students and a society by adding studies in this area. One only scan the field of religion to recognize that it has stated beliefs that member are to adhered to. Much the same as many "scientific" communities. Since the topic of the contitution was brought up, one section of the "establishment clause" is that a state (including a state university) cannnot oppose the establishment and practise of religion, note including specifying its belief system or criteria for membership. So, quotes from the constitution should include all aspects related to a particular issue. Note, nowhere was there a suggestion that any other religious nor non-religious group be denied the benefit to meet. Perhaps this Christian group is more tolerant, honest, and open minded while still maintaining a clear standard than many claiming tolerance for their positions in the university community. Something to think about. "

Dee wrote on May 24, 2007 3:22 PM:

" Dear Christian, Are you saying the Christian Legal Society would nominate a (good, upstanding, moral) Muslim? Or a Jew? Or a Hindu? Otherwise, it's the RELIGION that counts, not the faith and morality, that counts here. So SIU is supporting one particular religion. That's against our Constitution. If you don't like it, move to some country with a State religion, like Iran. "

Christian wrote on May 24, 2007 12:07 PM:

" No one said that the scholarship would be awarded based upon one's religion, only upon their faith, completly different, and their morality. Why would the Christian Legal Society award a scholarship to some one who did not carry and uphold the very morals and beliefs for which it stands? I am sure there are plenty of other groups who have rules and regulations for their members. The only difference lies in that they are not a Christian group. And because of this one reason no one says a word. This country was founded upon Faith and morality. Some where along the lines of time we have forgotten that or merely no longer care. It is sad that we must try to shut down one of the only good groups that remain on such a liberal and partylife school. I think its time we re-evaluate the true problem. We as a population are sending our kids to college to learn the art of partying. Our concern should NOT be who gets what scholarship, but rather HOW the scholarship is being used. "

dee wrote on May 24, 2007 9:40 AM:

" Surely it is unconstitutional for a state university to support a scholarship for which recipients will be chosen on the grounds of a specific religion. "


August 2008
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31