70°F
sponsored by:
FIND IT WITH OUR NEW DIRECTORY!
Click to activate search window!
Top    Subscribe to our feeds    Add to My Yahoo!
Advertisement

Advertising Info

Article Options

Comments (2 comment(s))  |  Email this story
Print this story  |  Discuss  |  Big Text  |  Normal Text
Current Rating:
0
   Number of Votes:
0
Rate:  |  |  | 
Save and Share  add to yahoo add delicious add to digg add to facebook add to reddit add to newsvine  
   How do I share?
Rental fees on agenda for Carbondale council
By Blackwell thomas, The Southern
Monday, October 15, 2007 10:29 PM CDT
CARBONDALE - As City Council members consider a proposed $35 annual inspection fee on rental dwellings, officials in a handful of college towns across the state are considering similar measures.

Universities are a part of the fabric of each of these communities. But a consequence of this, many officials said, is dumpy and often unsafe housing aimed at students looking to live on the cheap.

Some city officials think inspection fees and beefed-up ordinances could be the answer.

In DeKalb, home to Northern Illinois University, Ernie Pinne, chief property maintenance inspector, said a new inspection fee is on the way, perhaps by July 2008.

"Right now we do our inspections on a complaint-by-complaint basis," Pinne said. "That works out to about 10 to 12 inspections a day."

Pinne said, with a staff of just three inspectors, including him, and a pool of 7,500 rental properties, demand has outstripped the city's ability to inspect each dwelling.

"If we go with the rental inspection fee program we are looking at doubling our staff," he said. "With the number of complaints we're getting, the overall need is great. The goal is keeping people from getting hurt and saving lives."

Pinne said the planning is still in its infancy and the fee has not been determined.

Carbondale City Manager Jeff Doherty said the proposed fee would help fund the hiring of two new inspectors, bringing the total to seven. That should be enough, he said, to ensure the city reaches its goal of inspecting its 9,000 rental dwellings at least once every three years.

In Charleston, home of Eastern Illinois University, City Manager Scott Smith said he wishes he had the opportunity to implement any kind of inspection program. Because the town's population is fewer than 25,000, state law prevents officials there from mandating inspections, much less charging a fee.

Unless they are invited inside, Smith said, city officials in Charleston have no right to inspect a property. The problem of unsafe housing has ballooned as a result, he added.

"Two times recently we were invited into a home," he said. "In one, we had about 50 mattresses stacked up in a basement within inches of the light fixtures and in another we had a five gallon-bucket at the end of ? a sewage pipe. I think you can guess what was in the bucket."

Scott Morgan, housing inspector for Normal, said the city's rental inspection fee is working. Normal, home to Illinois State University and its 20,000 students, has a multi-tiered system that differentiates between single-family units, apartments, rooming houses and multi-use spaces, such as an apartment located above a retail space. The costs range from $30 for an apartment building and $5 for each unit to $50 for a single-family home.

Morgan said Normal has 9,000 rental properties and just three inspectors to complete annual inspections. He added that the city has not fallen behind in its inspections.

In Carbondale, Doherty said the city completed about 2,200 initial inspections last year and another 2,200 follow-up inspections.

"Of the 2,200 initial inspections ? about 1,600 were found to have violations," he said. "Now those violations range from minor to significant ? but that's a number that I wish were lower."

blackwell.thomas@thesouthern.com

351-5823


Add Your Own Comments

No account? Register here!

If you already have, sign in below:
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

 

Mr. Paul wrote on Oct 16, 2007 7:39 PM:

" You need to have a city inspection on all residential dwelling (own/rent) when it changes occupancy. This is done for a few reasons. 1. You can control how many occupants are in the home/apartment. 2. Creates additional revenue for the City and... 3. Brings the structure up to the latest safety codes. By doing so only for rental property is not only discriminatory but also ignorant. Think smart - if you are going to pick on someone - pick on everyone! "

Sarah wrote on Oct 16, 2007 11:17 AM:

" Here we go: Carbondale needs money to support the $5000 rental place buyout. Wonder where it will come from? Even better is that if places are to be inspected every three years, why charge an annual fee? Is it right that each inspection should cost $105 per dwelling (not complex, not location- EACH DWELLING)? Why would any decent person want to own and operate a business with this type of overhead? Property taxes have gone up a huge percentage for the upcoming year, insurance is skyrocketing, and the costs of materials to repair and maintain places is rising. Renting places is a business. Why would any smart and fair business person run such a business in Carbondale? Once again, it seems the City of Carbondale is driving business away from this town. There are a number of rules on the books to keep people safe. Why not enforce them against the problem landlords rather than taking it out on the decent ones? "