66°F
sponsored by:
FIND IT WITH OUR NEW DIRECTORY!
Click to activate search window!
Top    Subscribe to our feeds    Add to My Yahoo!
Advertisement

Advertising Info

Article Options

Comments (4 comment(s))  |  Email this story
Print this story  |  Discuss  |  Big Text  |  Normal Text
Current Rating:
0
   Number of Votes:
0
Rate:  |  |  | 
Save and Share  add to yahoo add delicious add to digg add to facebook add to reddit add to newsvine  
   How do I share?
'World's cleanest coal-fueled power plant' could come to Illinois
By Jeffrey Tomich, The Southern wire services
Sunday, December 16, 2007 10:43 PM CST
For the 4,400 residents of Tuscola, anticipation this holiday season goes beyond the annual Yule log lighting ceremony and Santa Chase 5k race.

The city, 176 miles north of Carbondale, is among four sites bidding for a $1.75 billion experimental coal-fueled power plant, called FutureGen, which will also produce hydrogen and emit virtually no pollution. Other finalists are Mattoon, 25 miles south of Tuscola on Interstate 57, and the Texas cities of Odessa and Jewett.

A winner will be announced tomorrow by the FutureGen Industrial Alliance, a consortium of a dozen of the world's largest energy and mining companies, including St. Louis-based Peabody Energy Corp., that's developing the project with the U.S. Energy Department.

To the cities bidding for the project, there is plenty riding on the decision, including 150 full-time jobs, 1,300 construction jobs and the cachet of being the home of "the world's cleanest coal-fueled power plant." Analysts, environmentalists and energy executives say there's more at stake.

Coal meets a fourth of the world's energy needs and use is projected to grow 73 percent by 2030, according to the International Energy Agency. Meanwhile, scientists are urging drastic cuts in emissions of carbon dioxide, a heat-trapping gas released when coal and other fossil fuels are burned. Otherwise, they warn of dire consequences from the continued warming of the earth's atmosphere, such as melting ice sheets and rising sea levels.

Many energy and environmental experts say weaning the United States off coal isn't a realistic option, nor is retrofitting 500 existing power plants, which are 35 years old on average. So despite the costs and technical challenges of doing so, making coal cleaner must be a priority.

"That's why FutureGen is so critical to closing the gap between what society wants industry to do and what technology is able to do," said Michael J. Mudd, head of the FutureGen Alliance and an executive at Columbus, Ohio-based American Electric Power Co.

Others are more blunt in their assessment, such as John Thompson of the Boston-based Clean Air Task Force, an environmental advocacy group. "There's a disconnect from where we are today and where we need to be," said Thompson, who works in Carbondale. "By mid-century, we need to have all plants capturing CO2 and we have zero plants doing it right now."

The Energy Department conceived FutureGen in February 2003 as a way to advance so-called clean coal technology, and will contribute more than $1 billion for the project with remaining costs shared among members of the FutureGen Alliance.

States bidding for the project are pitching in, too. The Illinois General Assembly and Gov. Rod Blagojevich agreed to offer $80 million in tax breaks, grants and low-interest loans to win the project - a lot, but just a fraction of the $981 million being dangled by Texas.

FutureGen is expected to begin operation in the fall of 2012. The plant will be able to produce 275 megawatts of electricity. That's just a fraction of the generation capacity of Peabody's 1,600-megawatt Prairie State Energy Campus in southwest Illinois despite costing more than three times as much on a per-kilowatt basis.

For now, however, the power delivered to the grid from FutureGen is a fringe benefit. The real goal is to prove the feasibility of producing electricity from coal with near-zero emissions in hopes that it can jump-start similar projects on a larger scale in the U.S. and around the world.

"FutureGen is an opportunity to keep trying to achieve the Holy Grail," said Howard Learner, executive director of the Environmental Law and Policy Center in Chicago. "That is, being able to use the U.S.'s enormous coal reserves in a way that is clean and protects the environment."


Add Your Own Comments

No account? Register here!

Terms & Conditions

If you already have, sign in below:
*Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

 

Liability wrote on Dec 17, 2007 3:38 PM:

" The scary part is that the state of Illinois is assuming liability if something goes wrong at this experimental facility. If there's a major accident or kids start getting cancer then Illinois taxpayers will be stuck with the bill. What a boondoggle! There are other ways to bring in jobs if politicians stop telling tall tails about reviving the coal industry. "

Huge Waste of Money wrote on Dec 17, 2007 3:37 PM:

" Why not spend the money on technologies we know will work like wind and solar? The coal companies have enough money to do their own research without taxpayer subsidies. "

Chicken Little wrote on Dec 17, 2007 9:00 AM:

" Wanna' bet that the unelected Club Sierra (aka Sierra Club) and it's over-paid legal predators are busy with plans to "deep 6" this project? "

BobbyR wrote on Dec 17, 2007 8:23 AM:

" Don't get your hopes up. There is a guy in the White House from Texas who will put a lump of coal in Illinois Christmas' stocking and load Texas Christmas stockings with greenbacks. He is perhps the most political one-sided, polarized person to ever occupy that seat. Dream on Illinois, do you really think FutureGen will be located in Illinois? "