81°F
sponsored by:
FIND IT WITH OUR NEW DIRECTORY!
Click to activate search window!
Front Page    Subscribe to our feeds    Add to My Yahoo!
Advertisement

Advertising Info

Article Options

Comments (7 comment(s))  |  Email this story
Print this story  |  Discuss  |  Big Text  |  Normal Text
Current Rating:
0
   Number of Votes:
0
Rate:  |  |  | 
Save and Share  add to yahoo add delicious add to digg add to facebook add to reddit add to newsvine  
   How do I share?
Williamson County residents have choices to make over proposed tax
By John D. Homan, The Southern
Monday, January 28, 2008 10:20 AM CST
MARION - "Shall Williamson County be authorized to impose a retailers' occupation tax and a service occupation tax (commonly referred to as a 'sales tax') at a rate of 1 percent to be used exclusively for school facility purposes?"

That is the question on the ballot voters will be asked to answer at the primary election on Feb. 5. A 1-percent tax increase is the same as being charged an extra penny on the dollar; it would apply to all purchased items in the county except groceries, state-titled vehicles and prescription drugs. Not only would county residents be subject to the tax, but also anyone shopping in the county.

Should the referendum pass, it is projected that the tax would generate about $7.5 million a year in revenue that would be divided up among the five school districts in the county based on enrollment. Marion would get the lion's share of the revenue, followed by Herrin, Carterville, Johnston City and Crab Orchard.

Carterville School Superintendent Tim Bleyer explained that voters who wish to vote on the referendum may do so without declaring their party affiliation as is the case with primary elections.

"They can just ask for a referendum ballot," he said.

Why are Williamson County school administrators asking for the tax?

The bottom line is that new schools need to be built because some are antiquated and others are too small and the state has been negligent in its commitment to new school construction funding.

Projects that were approved by the legislature five and six years ago are still unfunded. Local superintendents felt their backs were to the wall and that a sales tax is the most fair tax to ask residents to support.

Benefits of the tax are many. Bleyer said it will provide a consistent and growing funding stream that begins a shift away from burdensome property taxes to help pay for school construction.

"Other than schools, the local economy stands to gain with the passage of a sales tax increase," Bleyer said. "The sheer magnitude of the $75 million to $100 million school construction projects is expected to create jobs in the region."

If approved, Carterville would build a new high school. Marion would build a new elementary school in Creal Springs and a new high school. Johnston City would add classrooms at Lincoln Elementary School and make some modifications at other schools in the district.

Herrin and Crab Orchard would first use revenues generated by the tax to retire debt on schools that have already been built and later make upgrades to facilities. Those two school districts would also benefit the most initially from property tax relief.

The drawback to the sales tax is that it would be an extra dollar out of pocket for every hundred dollars spent. And Marion would vault to the No. 1 spot in the region when it comes to sales tax charged at 8.5 percent. Mayor Bob Butler said that concerns him. He said some shoppers may be dissuaded from buying in Marion if they have to pay even a little more on tax.

"I think that (tax increase) could put us at a competitive disadvantage," Butler said earlier this month.

An increase in sales tax could also prove detrimental to those home rule communities like Marion, which have used sales tax increases to pay for infrastructure repair and projects like Rent One Ballpark with the Southern Illinois Miners.

john.homan@thesouthern.com

351-5805


Add Your Own Comments

No account? Register here!

If you already have, sign in below:
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

 

Vote NO wrote on Feb 3, 2008 4:30 PM:

" Parents need to take responsibility for education their own children. It is NOT the place of government to do so. Aside from that, how will a new building improve education? Answer: it won't. This is just another attempt by the public schools to get more of our money. Vote No. "

Get real wrote on Jan 28, 2008 8:59 PM:

" It's very easy to see that the first 5 comments on this article were written by individuals that: 1) have no idea how the internal operations of a school system works, 2) do not know how the money is really spent (administrative salaries are a very small portion, 3)does not know the vast number of unfunded mandates that the schools must follow 4) does not know that they just insulted every graduate of the public school system and 5) has no loyalty to their own community, for if they did they would not throw out the word consolidation so easily and they would support this referendum. "

Two Solutions wrote on Jan 28, 2008 11:06 AM:

" I've got two easy solutions that will solve all of the school budget woes. First of all, CUT THE SPENDING! School leaders and administrators are so over-paid that it should make any tax-payer sick. And quit spending so much money on athletic facilities! If you're so concerned about the children, then focus more on classroom expenditures as opposed to new football stadiums. Secondly, CONSOLIDATE. Why do Crab Orchard and Johnston City still have their own individual school districts? Crab Orchard and J.C. should be consolidated into one district. That would eliminate numerous administrative and support positions that simply aren't necessary. I also would not be opposed to a Herrin-Carterville consolidation. CUT THE SPENDING and CONSOLIDATE! It's not rocket science. "

Heck NO!! wrote on Jan 28, 2008 9:56 AM:

" New taxes = No vote!! Live within your means and work with what you've got. Plain and simple. "

Perspective wrote on Jan 28, 2008 9:36 AM:

" The point of this article are valid and supportive from the school's point of view. However, to treat this as though it is not impacted by other issues is tunnel vision and short sighted. Schools have to change the way they are operated and ran. These administrators need to eliminate the excesses that exist and there needs to be a business minded approach. If these schools were fiscally responsible and were producing a quality product, then this is an easy sell. However, since the product they are putting forth is of such an inferior quality, they have to resort to emotional please and falsely generated accounting numbers for justification. I say, first you provide a quality return on the tay payer's investment and THEN we can talk about new structures. As it stands now, there is no faith that the system won't waste any gains by mis-managing this like they do the entire educational system. How is this any different than what they've done in the past? "

Perspective wrote on Jan 28, 2008 9:19 AM:

" Yes, let us also consider that on average, we pay 35% of our salary on taxes already in the form of taxation. Note that NO WHERE does it state that the property tax will be re-evaluated...only that 'begins a shift away'. I want 100% guarantees as anything this vague is not reassuring! I've had a lifetime of this political wordsmanship and can see exactly how this will go. The tax will get passed, nothing will change on the property tax, and the jobs will never materialize. People we adjust to spending the extra 1% and everyone will go on and debate the next tax increase with the same promise and rhetoric that is currently being used. Why doesn't the school system explore wasted efficiencies within their district before crying for more money? Why should we believe any of these school 'politicians' or anything they always have an excuse as to why they aren't getting the job done! The school system is flawed and will not change until they are forced to change as it is just too easy to keep shaking down the taxpayer for more and more money!! "

James Carville is my hero wrote on Jan 28, 2008 7:15 AM:

" Like I commented on a related article, a sales tax increase is the most unfair way to go. It will hurt low income and fixed income consumers the most. Raise property taxes on homes valued over $100,000. If you are able to afford a $100,000+ home, then you can certainly afford a few hundred more dollars a year in real estate taxes. Implement an income tax on those who make more than $40,000 a year. Those who are fortunate enough to make that kind of money should be able to give up a small portion of their income. In my opinion, there are more fair ways to handle the school funding issue other than jacking up the sales tax. "


August 2008
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31