73°F
sponsored by:
FIND IT WITH OUR NEW DIRECTORY!
Click to activate search window!
Local    Subscribe to our feeds    Add to My Yahoo!
Advertisement

Advertising Info

Article Options

Comments (7 comment(s))  |  Email this story
Print this story  |  Discuss  |  Big Text  |  Normal Text
Current Rating:
0
   Number of Votes:
0
Rate:  |  |  | 
Save and Share  add to yahoo add delicious add to digg add to facebook add to reddit add to newsvine  
   How do I share?
Shawnee forest hosts meeting on proposed fees
BY BECKY MALKOVICH, THE SOUTHERN
Monday, February 18, 2008 11:01 PM CST
GOREVILLE - Linda Kesul fears the worst for her small business if recreational fees and hikes are imposed as proposed in the Shawnee National Forest.

"I may as well shut the doors," she said.

Kesul owns Bay Creek Ranch in Simpson, a campground with lodging that was originally set up for horses and their riders, but now caters to a variety of clientele including hunters, bicyclists, hikers and tourists.

Kesul said high gas prices and the economy have already slowed business and the fees and increases proposed by the U.S., Forest Service could deal her business a death blow.

"It's just too much money, combined with all the other expenses. It's going to hurt all the small businesses in Pope County," she said. "It seems the decisions the forest service makes do not take into account the impact on the communities and small businesses in the area."

Kesul was one of about 85 people who attended an informational meeting Monday night at the Southern Illinois Equine Barn in Goreville.

Organizer and speaker Michael Scott explained his opposition to the fees, which will include a $5 per car, per day use charge at forest sites such as Pounds Hollow picnic and beach area and Garden of the Gods interpretive and picnic area and a $5 a day fee, or $50 per year, for equestrian use of designated trails.

An increase in campground fees is also proposed for some sites including Pine Ridge Campground, which would see a rise in fees from $5 to $12.

The forest service has said fees and increases are needed to maintain and continue recreational uses in the forest. Attempts to reach the forest service were unsuccessful Monday.

Scott said he was asked if he wouldn't be "preaching to the choir" by making his remarks to a crowd made up of horse enthusiasts, hikers and business owners who serve visitors to the forest.

"You're going to learn some new songs," he said.

Scott then asked how many people in the audience trust the forest service.

"Well, we've got one," he said of the sole audience member who raised a hand. "It's not the fees so much as the trust. Lots of people say they wouldn't mind giving if they knew the money would go to the trail, but they don't trust the forest service to do that."

Past surveys of equestrian use in the forest produced numbers that were "staggering," Scott said, between 38,000 and 40,000 riders in 2003 alone.

One survey estimated the total economic impact from horse camping in 2003 at $16 million.

"It's a huge, huge industry," Scott said.

If the proposed fees and hikes are approved, he said, Southern Illinois stands to lose tourism dollars to other places where fees aren't quite so high.

For example, he said equestrians who visit Land Between the Lakes are charged $60 per trailer whereas "If the same family comes to the Shawnee National Forest, they'll pay $200 a year."

Opponents of the proposed fees have gathered more than 1,200 signatures on petitions and are asking that those interested send their thoughts on the proposal by April 15 to Recreational Advisory Committee, c/o Region 9, Regional Office, 626 E. Wisconsin Ave., Milwaukee, WI or to Michael Scott, 60 Hill Top Lane, Simpson, IL 62985. Scott will deliver the comments in person when he travels to Wisconsin to present petitions and public comments to the forest service.

beckymalk@gmail.com

927-5633

What: Proposed fees and fee hikes for recreational use at Shawnee National Forest

For more information: Visit www.fs.fed.us/r9/forests/shawnee/rec-fee/drop


Add Your Own Comments

No account? Register here!

If you already have, sign in below:
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

 

j.j wrote on Feb 19, 2008 10:51 PM:

" they should just sell it to a private company to take care of it...since they obviously cant spend money on it...find someone who can... "

flame wrote on Feb 19, 2008 3:07 PM:

" i truly hope somebody steps up to the plate and realizes how ridiculous these fees are! there are several horse clubs that help maintain their "loops" at kinkaid and asking them to pay a big fee to use the trails for example is highly uncalled for. we arent a rich state by any means, being farmers and whatnot. where am i supposed to ride if the forest services "takes away" (figuratively speaking)my one and only place I CAN ride??? as a physically challenged rider kinkaid lake is the only place in the state that i am aware of that has facilities to enable those of us who have a true love for horses but just happen to be in a wheelchair. with the rate hikes most of us wont be able to afford to go riding anymore. "

Two Questions wrote on Feb 19, 2008 1:20 PM:

" If it is PUBLIC land, then why must we be forced to pay to use it? Do our tax dollars not pay for public parks and recreation areas? "

Derrick wrote on Feb 19, 2008 10:40 AM:

" I completely agree with Get Real. You use it, you should help pay. I pay for season passes for my local and state parks because I enjoy using them and don't mind helping support them. Go out and try to buy your own nature preserve; invite the public for free and see how much it costs to maintain trails, refuge removal and overall upkeep without support. "

Red Bud wrote on Feb 19, 2008 10:11 AM:

" If "Get real" is paying to hike at all the National Forests he has been to, he is not doing something right: I have hiked National Forests in more than a half dozen states, and not been charged to do so. I do understand that if you are paying for certain amenities such as canoeing (from maintained launches) or camping (in developed campgrounds) that a fee may be in order. But one should not have to pay a fee to just park and take off walking on public land. A $5 fee may not be onerous to "Get real" or others on a Forest Service salary; but for some people it is a financial burden which will keep them from using public land. That is not right. Anyone familiar with the history of public land management in Southern Illinois knows that an "adversarial attitude" is very much justified; and the Forest Service is responsible for that. They have repeatedly lied to the public, mismanaged our land, and wasted tax money. We should not enable more of this reprehensible behavior by handing them more money in the form of fees. "

Get real wrote on Feb 19, 2008 8:38 AM:

" I've visited state forests, state parks, national parks and national forests in at least half a dozen states besides Illinois. I've paid for use at all of them, whether I was hiking, canoeing, camping, swimming or horseback riding. I never saw the fee as an infringement on my civil rights, as people here evidently do. Rather, I saw it as supporting, with a nominal fee, the natural area I was using. Some of the fees were paid in areas every bit as economically depressed as Southern Illinois and in areas at least as if not more dependent on the natural area for a significant portion of the area industry. It is time for this hysteria in Southern Illinois to stop. The proposed fees are not at all outrageous and it is perfectly reasonable to ask people who use the forest to help with its upkeep. There is no conspiracy here, people, and your adversarial attitude does not help your cause. "

Larry wrote on Feb 19, 2008 7:16 AM:

" So, these great natural wonders are the King's land after all and we peasants have to ante up to use them. Illinois is bankrupt under Blagvampire and the US Forest service pretends that we cannot use the forests if they are not charging us...make them free...get out of the way and let us use them. "


August 2008
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31