82°F
sponsored by:
FIND IT WITH OUR NEW DIRECTORY!
Click to activate search window!
Front Page    Subscribe to our feeds    Add to My Yahoo!
Advertisement

Advertising Info

Article Options

Comments (5 comment(s))  |  Email this story
Print this story  |  Discuss  |  Big Text  |  Normal Text
Current Rating:
0
   Number of Votes:
0
Rate:  |  |  | 
Save and Share  add to yahoo add delicious add to digg add to facebook add to reddit add to newsvine  
   How do I share?
Which candidate will bring back FutureGen?

Local politicians discuss likelihood of clean-coal project returning to Mattoon
By Blackwell Thomas, The Southern
Sunday, April 6, 2008 10:26 PM CDT
The arrival of an experimental power plant in Illinois seemed guaranteed last December when a consortium of mining and power companies announced Mattoon as the future site of the clean-coal burning FutureGen plant.

But today, funding for the project is in limbo for reasons many say are political and nothing more. And while others wonder if President Bush's loyalty to Mattoon's west Texas competitors might have influenced the decision by the Department of Energy to pull funding, some Illinois politicians say there is no question.

"I am convinced it was political," U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin said in an interview with The Southern last week. "It wasn't until Illinois beat Texas that this administration pulled the plug on this."

Illinois State Sen. Dale Righter, a Republican from Charleston, said Durbin's sentiment crosses party lines.

"If you look at it objectively, and I don't like to say it because the president is the leader of my party, but it was clearly political - any other explanation doesn't pass the smell test," Righter said.

"The Department of Energy, the administration, were all giving the green light; then Illinois was announced. Within a matter of days (DOE) is suddenly voicing concerns about funding. The price didn't escalate in three weeks," he said.

Righter's district stood to benefit heavily from the $1.8 billion plant, the 3,000 construction jobs and 150 permanent positions it would have created.

The project would also have been the first of its kind to use sequestration of greenhouse gases by pumping them into geological formations about a mile underground and possibly help provide a boost to Illinois' coal mining industry.

Last December, the five-year effort to land FutureGen had come down to Mattoon competing against Tuscola and two Texas towns, Jewett and Odessa. State officials say Illinois spent about $1.8 million campaigning on behalf of its two candidate cities and when Mattoon was announced by the FutureGen Alliance, it appeared the investment had paid off.

But since that announcement, elation has turned to frustration as the Department of Energy said the proposed federal funding for the project, about $1.1 billion, would not be forthcoming. Instead it was announced that the money would be invested in smaller clean energy projects.

State Rep. Mike Bost, R-Murphysboro, said he wasn't convinced the reason for DOE pulling funding was entirely political and the issue is one that should transcend party politics, at least in Illinois.

"If it was based on the president's decision, Texas would have just got the money," he said. "I am frustrated with the decision. I am not happy, but we are going to continue to work in bipartisan fashion on keeping this alive."

Durbin said he was not holding out hope that funding will be restored while Bush is in the White House.

"We are going to try to keep this concept alive until this Secretary of Energy and administration have left town," he said. "We don't have a chance as long as they are here."

So of the current crop of presidential candidates, a field that includes Democratic Sens. Barack Obama of Illinois and Hillary Clinton of New York and Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona, who would provide the greatest opportunity for FutureGen to move forward?

"I don't know Sen. McCain's position on this ? but I know for certain that Sen. Obama and Sen. Clinton very much support the FutureGen Alliance," said Durbin.

A spokesman from Obama's Washington Senate office reiterated Durbin's assertion. Messages left with McCain's and Clinton's offices went unreturned.

Bost said, as an Illinois resident, Obama has to support FutureGen but both Clinton and McCain would be wise to follow suit.

"If Barack doesn't win, (candidates) trying to pick up their Illinois base would want to support (FutureGen)," he said. "There are no other sites (for FutureGen). With Barack, it's his home state, but the other two would be able to try to pick up votes, recoup friends and influence legislators."

blackwell.thomas@thesouthern.com / 351-5823


Add Your Own Comments

No account? Register here!

If you already have, sign in below:
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

 

Member#1 wrote on Apr 7, 2008 12:06 PM:

" Any Democrat elected to the office of President will bring FutureGen to Illinois. Both Senator Clinton and Obama have strong Illinois ties and will help the state. Like President Carter, who was the first to promote energy self sufficency through a comprehensive energy policy, both Democratic candidates will be committed to an energy policy that will help the USA reduce its dependency on foreign oil. Clinton and Oboma, unlike the Republicans who take large donations from oil corporations and and give big oil priority, will put national interest and individual needs ahead of Bush and Chaney's oil buddies. "

Citizen wrote on Apr 7, 2008 10:31 AM:

" Correction: Obama is not from Illinois. He is from Hawaii. His mother is from Kansas and his father is from Kenya. He spent several of his frmative years in Jakarat, Indonesia. He studied in Muslim Madrassas (Islamic Schools). He was "sent" to Cook County to establish his liberal political credentials after graduating from Harvard Law. He is the liberal version of the Manchrurian Candidate. Obama knows about as much about Illinois (outside of Chicago) that Southern Illinoisan's do about Hawaii or Indonesia. Barak Obama is not an Illinoisan. He is a "made man" who only used Chicago as his springboard onto the international stage. "

R2D2 wrote on Apr 7, 2008 10:29 AM:

" No matter the puffing from Sen. Durbin, the 'cluster farce' of Illinois-style politics, coupled with the ‘Religion of Green” will talk and litigate this subject to death. In fact, if I were an environmental nut hatch, I would complain to The Southern about wasting good paper (which comes from trees) on what is for drawn conclusion and thus a non-story. "

Ex-Local wrote on Apr 7, 2008 7:01 AM:

" Neither Obama nor Clinton will revive FurtureGen. It's only wishful thinking. Environmental extremists have too much influence on them. Unless it involves solar, wind, or some other kind of made up "green" energy, neither candidate will touch it. Clinton keeps on mentioning "clean coal technology". Whatever. Her husband destroyed the coal industry with his so called clean air act. Why would she be any different? And Obama acts like coal is the plague or something. Just because he is from Illinois certainly does not mean he would revive FutureGen. Again, it would only be wishful thinking. "

Watching wrote on Apr 7, 2008 2:44 AM:

" You can be sure of one thing it will NOT be Obama or Clinton to help bring FutureGen to Illinois. Check Obama's record, what has he done for Illinois? People you must understand Barack Obama voted against Prairie State Campus (mine-mouth power plant) at Lively Grove Illinois EVERYTIME it came to vote in Washington DC. He would first consult with Senator Clinton then voted with her against building this modern, 100% pollution free power plant that will use our coal reserves in Southern Illinois. At last count it came to vote 3 times. It has taken Peabody Coal FIVE years to get past all hurdles but ground breaking was last Oct. It will employ approx 2,400 in construction and 250+ permanently. Barak Obama was more worried about good standing with Senator Clinton than the unemployed people of Illinois! "


August 2008
S M T W T F S
1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31