page masthead
72°F
sponsored by:
FIND IT WITH OUR NEW DIRECTORY!
Click to activate search window!
Voice Of The Southern    Subscribe to our feeds    Add to My Yahoo!
Advertisement

Advertising Info

Article Options

Comments (1 comment(s))  |  Email this story
Print this story  |  Discuss  |  Big Text  |  Normal Text
Current Rating:
0
   Number of Votes:
0
Rate:  |  |  | 
Save and Share  add to yahoo add delicious add to digg add to facebook add to reddit add to newsvine  
   How do I share?
We need new jobs, not a shell game
Saturday, May 17, 2008 11:24 PM CDT
When he visited Southern Illinois last week, Gov. Rod Blagojevich was asked about a plan to move a division of the Illinois Department of Transportation from Springfield to Southern Illinois.

"All I know is there will be 150 new jobs and I'm really excited about it," Blagojevich said.

Within a matter of days, the number of jobs supposedly on the move list was down to 110. The difference? The division's leaders, and their staff, get to stay in Springfield.

Huh?

We truly are left scratching our heads, and wondering whether anyone believes the governor is being truthful when he talks about moving an IDOT division, and that he wants to do so to help the economically depressed Southern Illinois region.

This "plan," supposedly conceived about two years ago, is now pitched as a way the state could save money by canceling a $1.7 million lease on IDOT's current facility in Springfield.

The state may, indeed, be paying too much for the current lease and should look into alternate locations. In fact, every lease the state has should be examined and savings potential.

We're certainly not opposed to our region playing host to state operations, and the jobs that go with them.

But there are too many nagging questions about this proposal. Though presented as a "plan," it sounds more like something the governor suddenly envisioned.

When state Sen. Gary Forby was asked in Springfield why the governor's office would suggest moving the IDOT division without having a specific site identified in Southern Illinois, Forby replied, "That's the governor's office. I don't have a clue."

By his own actions - suggesting certain prison closures, then reversing positions, as one example - Blagojevich alienates the very lawmakers he needs to pass the programs he wants.

Blagojevich recently forged ahead to expand the state's health care programs for the needy without legislative approval. The merits of such expansion is open for debate; how Blagojevich went about it infuriated lawmakers.

So when he suggests moving families for the sake of helping a depressed part of the state, there is both healthy skepticism and solid factual grounds for questioning the merits of the plan.

Instead of merely moving existing state jobs from one region into another, which critics have accurately described as "robbing Peter to pay Paul," the Blagojevich administration should be concentrating on attracting new jobs to the state of Illinois.

We acknowledge that Blagojevich and his people played a key role in bringing the once-promising FutureGen project to Mattoon. But now that the plan has been scuttled by the U.S. Department of Energy, what's being done as an alternative?

State manufacturing jobs are declining and our unemployment rate is still higher than the national average. Locally, we learned earlier this week that 187 miners in Galatia are being laid-off, perhaps permanently.

This isn't the time for a state employment shell game, even if the jobs are moved into Southern Illinois. Our fear is that at some point in the future, the shell game might again be used to move state jobs out of Southern Illinois into another struggling area.

We need leadership from our state government and a vision for future employment. Let's focus on the state we hope to be in coming years, one that identifies and embraces growth industries and employers.


Add Your Own Comments

No account? Register here!

If you already have, sign in below:
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

 

Grayson wrote on May 18, 2008 7:36 AM:

"
Hello Folks,

The following Letter to the Editor was published May 6th. Since then, several major issues confronting the people of Illinois have been addressed by other writers, e.g., Professor Kenney on funding the Illinois Works Development Plan, the Editors of the Southern Illinoisan on the lack of leadership in Springfield, and of course, comments too numerous to mention regarding the public's lack of trust in our State government.

In previous postings, I have asked folks to list their top three priorities hat they believe should be addressed in State government.

1st Amendment, Joe Duncan and several others have responded. To you, I thank you. However, to the rest of you, I renew my request.

I believe it is important that the people of Illinois make their priorities known.

Please take a moment and tell us what are your three top priorities?

'You work for us'

To the Editor:

This is for our elected public servants in Springfield: It is time for an accounting. Some of you are, indeed, public servants. Some of you are, however, an utter and complete embarrassment to our state and the ideals of public service.

We demand accountability. That is only right as we, the People, are your employers. You are our employees. We elected you to do a job.

Among the many pressing issues confronting our state, the following require your immediate attention:

1) Focus on Ethics. We demand integrity, honesty, fairness, and a genuine dedication to doing what is right. Why did the Senate vote down the recall? Why do you fear the very people who elected you? Is there a reason?

2) Setting Budget Priorities. Focus on the essential needs of the People and scrap the rest. Focus on essential needs - not wants. Ensure that budgetary allocations provide for the long-term strategic growth of our economy. Focus on education and infrastructure development. Also, be sure to pay your past due bills.

3) Develop a comprehensive and rational plan to pay for the Illinois Works Development Plan. You have identified the need for the program - now tell us the truth about how we are going to pay for it. Be honest with us.

The list could go on and on. Nevertheless, the first three tasks are priorities. Get those tasks accomplished and report back to us, your employers, and we will give you further tasks to accomplish.

After all, you work for us. Remember?

Grayson Gile

"