34°F
sponsored by:
FIND IT WITH OUR NEW DIRECTORY!
Click to activate search window!


Latest News    Subscribe to our feeds    Add to My Yahoo!
Advertisement

Advertising Info

Article Options

Comments (3 comment(s))  |  Email this story
Print this story  |  Discuss  |  Big Text  |  Normal Text
Current Rating:
1
   Number of Votes:
1
Rate:  |  |  | 
Save and Share  add to yahoo add delicious add to digg add to facebook add to reddit add to newsvine  
   How do I share?
Herrin superintendent says if sales tax increase goes away, property taxes increase
BY JOHN HOMAN, The Southern
Friday, October 3, 2008 3:11 PM CDT
HERRIN — The superintendent of the Herrin Unit 4 School District says that should last February’s 1 percent sales tax increase for the five Williamson County school districts get overturned in court, property owners in Herrin will suffer the most.

Superintendent Mark Collins explained that property owners received 32.6 percent reduction in real estate taxes this year thanks to the sales tax increase. Collins explained that unlike Marion and Carterville, who are pursuing the construction of new schools, Herrin is simply working to retire old school debt. That freed up money for the district to reduce real estate taxes for residents.

But if a lawsuit filed by Marion attorney Ron Osman on behalf of P&S Grain challenging the legality of the sales tax increase is upheld in court, Collins said Herrin taxpayers will be negatively impacted.

“Without available sales tax revenues, I would be forced to levy against taxpayers’ property in the amount of $1.5 million next year because bond payments on the new high school are due Dec. 1, 2009 and then again June 1, 2010,” Collins said.

“The issue is before the court,” Osman said. “Is it (1 percent county tax increase) constitutionally allowable since it’s the first time such a referendum has been done in Illinois? I don’t believe it is.

“The procedure that all the school districts used (in forming the referendum question) was flawed,” Osman said. “And notification to the public (of the referendum) by the county board was flawed. It was not done in accordance with the statute, even if it was constitutional.”

Osman said that while it’s true that Herrin taxpayers did see a reduction in their real estate taxes this year, he’s not so sure the savings was that great when compared to what they had to pay extra in sales tax.

“I question whether the taxpayers of Herrin have had any kind of real tax reduction,” he said.

Collins said those Herrin taxpayers who were skeptical they would receive a discount have now seen firsthand what a yes vote on the sales tax did for their real estate taxes.

“We gave the taxpayers exactly what we said we were going to give them if the sales tax passed — a sizeable property tax cut. And everybody in town knows how much money they have saved.”

Collins said it’s only fair that residents know what they stand to lose if the lawsuit filed against the county board is approved.

“All I’m saying is that if Herrin residents don’t want to see their vote wasted and the sales tax overturned, they ought to speak out now. Because if the tax is removed, residents will have their property taxes raised considerably next year.”

Collins said the county board and State’s Attorney Charles Garnati are battling the lawsuit and any support that they can receive from the taxpayers would be beneficial to the cause.

The 1 percent sales tax increase countywide is paid by anyone making purchases in Williamson County.

 


Add Your Own Comments

No account? Register here!

If you already have, sign in below:
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

 

Charlie1935 wrote on Oct 4, 2008 7:12 PM:

" Springfield should held responsible for many things that have taken place in the years the present administration has been in office. Remember that at election time. "

Right_Minded wrote on Oct 4, 2008 12:50 AM:

" What I don't understand is why the uninformed voters of Williamson County voted this tax into practice in the first place.

It is the responsibility of the state Legislature to provide funding for schools. Voting to approve that tax simply told Springfield to keep their money.

Springfield needs to be held responsible, made to provide adequate funding for schools.

The Williamson County taxpayers and residents should not be forced to provide funding that is intended to be provided by the state. "

Bite_me_Collins wrote on Oct 3, 2008 4:13 PM:

" I'm speaking out now and I'm asking why doesn't Mark make sure we get a good return on the money that he is taking and paying teacher salaries with. There are some very incompetent teachers in this district who should not be living on the welfare system we call 'education'. For the life of me, I don't understand how we won't tolerate incompetence in our workplace, yet we allow it to run rampant within our school districts and administration doesn't do anything about it. I'm demanding some return for MY investment and I sure haven't seen it yet!! Quit wasting MY money as a bunch of us are sick and tired of your games!! "