page masthead
30°F
sponsored by:
FIND IT WITH OUR NEW DIRECTORY!
Click to activate search window!
Voice Of The Reader    Subscribe to our feeds    Add to My Yahoo!
Advertisement

Advertising Info

Article Options

Comments (5 comment(s))  |  Email this story
Print this story  |  Discuss  |  Big Text  |  Normal Text
Current Rating:
1
   Number of Votes:
1
Rate:  |  |  | 
Save and Share  add to yahoo add delicious add to digg add to facebook add to reddit add to newsvine  
   How do I share?
Voice of the Reader 10-4
Saturday, October 4, 2008 5:59 PM CDT
Don't count on new trees

To the Editor:

The Bush administration announced a global warming initiative to plant on mined lands 38 million trees a year for three years. Don't count on Illinois yet, Illinois coal companies from 1930 to 1968 planted 18 million trees. Prime timber today are Sahara Woods near Harrisburg with our best stand of white oak, Black Diamond near Du Quoin also with apple and peach orchards, and forests and lakes of Pyramid State Park south of Pinckneyville that have been an environmental, educational and recreational boon. Federal and Illinois strip-mine regulations strong on control and weak on good reclamation ended successful tree planting in the 1970s.

Illinois has failed to implement strip-mine laws properly. Much strip-mined land west of Harrisburg and north of Illinois 13, where forests are legally required to be replaced, now has fields being invaded by exotic autumn olive and cedars. By 2028 mined lands, now grassland from Pinckneyville to Sparta, will be the same.

There are no forests; the soils now replaced in Southern Illinois have grown weeds, not trees.

Forcing companies to replace four-foot of infertile, compacted, poorly-drained fragipan and claypan soils forfeits an irreplaceable opportunity to build better soils. Let reclamation specialists with needed skills enrich minesoils with fresh minerals for increased fertility, good drainage, and reduce reclamation costs now $30,000 an acre.

Progressive mining states like Kentucky will plant the 38 million trees per year announced yesterday. The deforesting of Illinois by IDNR has no end in sight.

Clark Ashby, Carbondale

Save our state parks

To the Editor:

You may soon lose your opportunity to ride a bicycle or hike in a state park. A camping vacation with your kids or grandchildren may be more expensive because you'll be traveling farther to reach a campground. Visit a taxpayer-supported historic site after Oct. 15 and you could be arrested for trespassing.

Gov. Blagojevich's decision to close 11 state parks and 13 historic sites doesn't take into account that $2.4 billion are spent in Illinois on wildlife-related activities - bird-watching, hunting and fishing - and 44 million visitors go to our state parks each year. Also, park concessionaires and other local businesses will suffer if the parks close.

Restricting access to natural areas will add to the alarming trends showing our children are spending more time with television and video games than pursuing imaginative play outdoors. A child is six times more likely to play a video game than ride a bike on any given day. There is also a national campaign to address the trend of "nature deficit disorder" in children and to "leave no child inside."

A century ago, President Teddy Roosevelt urged every American to make conservation the patriotic thing to do.

Now, it is time send a message and make your voices heard about our priceless state parks and historic sites. I ask you to start by visiting www.SaveOurStateParks.org.

Pat Quinn, Lieutenant Governor

McCain means more troubles

To the Editor:

This election I will vote for Obama and I believe everyone should. George W. Bush has proven to be the worst president in living memory. His intentions may have been good, but he wasn't smart enough to pull it off.

John McCain claims to be a maverick, but he has voted with Bush more than 90 percent of the time. Like Bush, McCain lacks the circuits and the patience to deal with complexity. Unfortunately, life is messy. International and domestic affairs are not always as neat as we would prefer. Short, simply-stated responses may have wide appeal, but don't often lead to best solutions.

Sarah Palin thinks McCain is right about most everything. Barack Obama loves America. He is very smart and he's the bravest man I know. Republican presidents have a habit of announcing cut-and-dried positions that have to be reversed when circumstances call for re-evaluation. Reagan gave us Iran-Contra, Bush Sr. said "Read my lips," and Bush Jr. insisted Iraq had WMDs.

If McCain is elected, I suspect history will, indeed, repeat itself. Somebody once said that nobody ever lost money betting on the innocence of the voting public. I used to think that was funny.

Ed Willis, Oraville


Add Your Own Comments

No account? Register here!

If you already have, sign in below:
Member ID:
*Password:
  Forgot Your Password?
 

 

Sam wrote on Oct 4, 2008 6:20 PM:

" This silly, dumb litmus test of patriotism outlined by Steve S., conservatives and Repubs is nothing more than another under handed attempt to challenge the patriotism of anyone who doesn't agree with them. It's little more than scrapping the bottom of their bag of dirty tricks.

Whether it's the Pledge of Allegiance or national anthem they all amount to nothing more than loyalty oaths.

The Founders of this nation hated loyalty oaths because they were used by England to demand on the spot loyalty to the king from the colonists. This is why our Founders adamantly opposed the codification of a loyalty oath when setting up our nation. And it's why I consider it an act of patriotism to refuse to recite such an oath even when required by law as it is here in Illinois. So whether one puts his hand on his heart or not misses the point. We shouldn't even be reciting such oaths as per the Founders' wishes.

By far, the better test of a patriot would be to question our leaders when they propose to send our troops to illegally invade another nation based on lies. By this standard, Obama is a patriot while those who supported the Iraq invasion and occupation are not.

Steve, you might do well to do a little research as to how the Pledge of Allegiance came about in the first place. You might be shocked. Google "Francis Bellamy" or "origin of the Pledge of Allegiance" if you dare. "

Steve S. wrote on Oct 4, 2008 12:51 PM:

" 1. Ok, saluting, hand over the heart.. something. Slouching I don't think qualifies for a would be Commander and Chief. And the flag IS the symbol of our country. Not for just now but for everything the people and this country have been through since we broke away from England. This is probably the only nation where one could ignite a flag and still be alive by the time it's finished burning. Sad.
2. His book, his own words. "

bugler wrote on Oct 4, 2008 12:29 PM:

" Steve, here is the appropriate etiquette for the flag, pledge of allegience and anthem. I found the same thing at several online sites.

"The pledge of allegiance should be rendered by standing at attention, facing the flag, and saluting.
When the national anthem is played or sung, citizens should stand at attention and salute at the first note and hold the salute through the last note. The salute is directed to the flag, if displayed, otherwise to the music."

This is a little different to most countries, where one stands only for LIVE performance of the anthem.

Short comment: in that famous photo, NO ONE knew the correct etiquette.

In any event, the pledge of allegiance is about a FLAG, the country comes second. I'd much rather have a president who respects the country than one who respects the flag. McCain only respects those parts of our country that are represented by lobbyists.

Just when did Obama say he would "side with his Arab and Muslim friends if it came down to it"? Can you name a source? (Rush Bimbo doesn't count.) "

Steve S. wrote on Oct 4, 2008 8:59 AM:

" Ed: Barack loves America does he? Guess that's why he wouldn't put his left hand over his heart during Our National Anthem. His wife loves America,, NOW,, that her husband is running for president. He said he would side with his Arab and Muslim friends if it came down to it. 143 days in the Senate. I have stuff in my refrigerator that has been there longer than that. Sounds like you are tickled pink the way Illinois is being governed. Barack is out of the same Daley stable as Blajokevitch, Mike Madigan and Emil Jones. If all this floats your boat then by all means, vote for this rookie and you will get just what you deserve. "

Yeah, Sure wrote on Oct 4, 2008 7:57 AM:

" Ed, Ed, Ed..... have you not visited "fact check" dot org? Obama voted straight dem party lines (exactly what Bush has done, just the other side of the political fence) OVER 95% of the time. Why not do some actual thinking for yourself and get your mind outside the box. I know it seems like a long shot but until we let the two main parties in this country know that they absolutely work for us and we won't put up with them thinking any differently, they won't change. What exactly has the Dem. controlled congress done for us? They haven't made any big changes, so what makes you think that a party-line voting hardcore lefty President(check his record, that is exactly what Obama is, based on how he votes) will do any different? It will be more of the same again. No, it is time we vote anyone in Washington who simply votes party lines out. Maybe even go so far that if they're an incumbent, vote them out. Until those in Washington realize that they work for US and we don't owe them a thing, they will not change the status quo. There are good alternatives to voting traditional party lines, check out the Constitutional party, Libertarian party, and the Green party. I bet that if you look at the candidates in those parties, you will find one that more closely aligns with your (as I did) southern Illinois traditional values. Then, vote your conscience. Dems and Republicans will tell you that you are wasting your vote, but that's because they are afraid that those of us who are disenfranchised enough to vote against them will quickly become the majority and they will have to change their ways. Frankly, it is time we force them to do just that. "