Letters 11/14
Thursday, November 13, 2008 10:53 PM CST
Read it all and ponder others' views
To the Editor:
If you are a regular reader of the letters to the editor and the political cartoon, but you don't take the time to read the lead editorial or the columnists, I want to encourage you to do so. You can't claim to be politically aware if you limit your exposure to Fox News and your neighbor's opinions.
While I am a devoutly liberal Democrat, my favorite columnist is Kathleen Parker, a conservative Republican. I regularly disagree with her, but I always admire her. I respect her honesty and perceptivity.
If you enjoy the Jerry Springer television show, you will probably like Ann Coulter's ultra-conservative venom. Mona Charen is as narrow- minded as Coulter, but she lacks Ann's flamboyant gall.
I like Clarence Page and Leonard Pitts. They do their homework and present solid, liberal observations. If you harbor a hint of racism, or if you think liberalism is the opposite of pragmatism, you should read these two excellent commentators.
Ed Willis
Oraville
Bring back the telephone party line
To the Editor:
With today's economy creating a pinch in practically everyone's pocketbook, one viable option that would help many people would be to reinstate the telephone party line.
Once upon a time, party lines were extremely prevalent and were defined as phone lines shared by several subscribers, a local loop of two, four, eight or as many as 16 parties. Each household on a party line would be assigned a distinct pattern of rings, such as two longs and a short. Families would know that whenever the phone sounded this pattern, the call was for them.
Of course, just as there is proper etiquette in cell phone usage, there is specific etiquette in using the telephone in party line situations. With less disposable income available these days for an increasing numbers of American families, maybe now is the time to pull the plug on the obsolescence of such a useful instrument, permitting the option to obtain such a service if so desired.
Granted, there is no privacy on a party line as any party can pick up the phone and answer the call or listen in on it yet a sense of community was established through the use of party lines when it was available.
Although the convenience of single party lines may be desirable, a family's desperation between having no phone or a party line in an economy plunging toward a depression creates a workable option and a tad more advantageous in today's world.
Joanne Clayton
Herrin
limbaughtomy wrote on Nov 14, 2008 9:47 PM:
Seriously though, thats the best response you have to Willis's letter, Allah forbid you actually submit a letter yourself. Wink-wink. He offers a pretty good analysis of Coultergeist and Mona Mona while giving due respect to Ms. Parker. And I say that because she's no echo chamber like the aforementioned cheerleaders.
I should mention before you bring up them the Coulter/Hannity/Limbaugh/O'Reilly/Charen equivalents of the Left as I have little use for them either. They, as their counterparts, simply feed you fear and hatred for others simply to increase their bottom dollars. Do you really believe Rush Limbaugh or Michael Moore give a turd what's best for the average American? There's middle ground to be found by all out there somewhere, but I don't see you capable of even looking for it. You've got a soggy diaper to worry about first. "