Because this is a presidential election year I expect a lot of phone calls. They will be roughly divided into two camps:
1. Democrats who consider me a right-wing wacko who really should be chirping with the other far-out loons on talk radio.
2) Republicans who think I’m in league with the rest of the “liberal press” to suppress the “real” news and perhaps vote Dan Rather into the White House.
Neither is accurate. And since I’m catching criticism from both camps in roughly equal numbers I feel justified in claiming to be a true middle-of-the-road kind of guy.
That’s what I’m telling the author of the following message, who claims we did wrong by publishing a story about conservatives questioning Barack Obama’s patriotism on page 3A of Sunday’s paper.
“I am outraged at the smear campaign taking place to question Barack Obama’s patriotism. Articles such as Nedra Pickler’s Sunday piece for the AP masquerade as news, until finally a significant number of people are repeating the meme as if it were true. The media should not be an echo chamber for conservative attacks.
If I continue to find such disgusting material in your newspaper, I’ll simply quit reading it. And you wonder why newspaper subscriptions are drying up!”
Subscriptions at The Southern Illinois are doing just fine, actually, and we now reach more people in the region than ever before through our paper and Web site. Research shows three quarters of our market read either our paper or Web site regularly so we’re not exactly “drying up.”
The story was based on conservatives asking questions about Obama. It actually happened. How is that not news? We’ve also reported on the suspicions surrounding Republican U.S. Senator John McCain’s past association with a lobbyist. How is that not news?
We’ll be running a lot of stories about all of the candidates. You eventually may find a story that seems unfair to your favorite candidate. I hope not, but it might happen. We offer the broadest possible spectrum of news and opinions, while taking great care to prevent the publication of falsehoods. But we can’t be sure of how any individual message will be received and interpreted, no matter how carefully it is presented.
What would you do differently?